高雄醫學大學圖書館 |

語系/ Language: 繁體中文

登入

回首頁 到查詢結果 [ subject:"Nursing Theory." ]

Theoretical nursing :development and...

Meleis, Afaf Ibrahim.

Theoretical nursing :development and progress /

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Theoretical nursing :/ Afaf Ibrahim Meleis.
其他題名:	development and progress /
作者:	Meleis, Afaf Ibrahim.
出版者:	Philadelphia :Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, : 2012.,
版本:	5th ed.
面頁冊數:	xiii, 672 p. :ill. ; : 26 cm.;
提要註:	"An additional assumption was that the processes for theory development were new to nursing and hence, nurses in graduate programs learned strategies for advancing knowledge from other disciplines. This assumption was debunked with the knowledge that nurses were always engaged in knowledge development, driven by their experiences in clinical practice. Because of these assumptions, most of the early writing about theory development was about outlining strategies that should be used, rather than strategies that have already been used in the discipline to develop theories. Theorists themselves did not uncover or adequately discuss ways by which they developed their theories, therefore the tendency was to describe processes that were based on theories developed in other disciplines, mainly the physical and social sciences. And an implicit assumption was made that there should be a single strategy for theory development, some claiming to begin the process from practice, and others believing it should be driven by research"--Provided by publisher.
標題:	Nursing - Philosophy. -
ISBN:	9781605472119 (hard) :

Theoretical nursing :development and progress /
Meleis, Afaf Ibrahim.

Theoretical nursing :development and progress /Afaf Ibrahim Meleis. - 5th ed. - Philadelphia :Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins,2012. - xiii, 672 p. :ill. ;26 cm.

Includes bibliographical references (pages 502-635) and indexes.

"An additional assumption was that the processes for theory development were new to nursing and hence, nurses in graduate programs learned strategies for advancing knowledge from other disciplines. This assumption was debunked with the knowledge that nurses were always engaged in knowledge development, driven by their experiences in clinical practice. Because of these assumptions, most of the early writing about theory development was about outlining strategies that should be used, rather than strategies that have already been used in the discipline to develop theories. Theorists themselves did not uncover or adequately discuss ways by which they developed their theories, therefore the tendency was to describe processes that were based on theories developed in other disciplines, mainly the physical and social sciences. And an implicit assumption was made that there should be a single strategy for theory development, some claiming to begin the process from practice, and others believing it should be driven by research"--Provided by publisher.

ISBN: 9781605472119 (hard) :NT2010

LCCN: 2010051628

Nat. Bib. Agency Control No.: 101549089DNLMSubjects--Topical Terms:

213275
Nursing
--Philosophy.

LC Class. No.: RT84.5 / .M45 2012

Dewey Class. No.: 610.7301

National Library of Medicine Call No.: WY 86

Theoretical nursing :development and progress /
LDR:01828cam a2200265 i 4500 001 248931
008 120712s2012 paua b 001 0 eng
010 $a 2010051628
016 7 $a 101549089 $2 DNLM
016 7 $a 015729804 $2 Uk
020 $a 9781605472119 (hard) : $c NT2010
020 $a 1605472115 (hard)
035 $a (OCoLC)693512876
035 $a ocn693512876
040 $a KMU $d KMU
042 $a pcc
050 0 0 $a RT84.5 $b .M45 2012
060 1 0 $a WY 86
060 4 $a WY 86 $b M519 2012
082 0 0 $a 610.7301 $2 22
100 1 $2 97000 $a Meleis, Afaf Ibrahim. $3 233132
245 1 0 $a Theoretical nursing : $b development and progress / $c Afaf Ibrahim Meleis.
250 $a 5th ed.
260 $a Philadelphia : $c 2012. $b Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins,
300 $a xiii, 672 p. : $b ill. ; $c 26 cm.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references (pages 502-635) and indexes.
520 $a "An additional assumption was that the processes for theory development were new to nursing and hence, nurses in graduate programs learned strategies for advancing knowledge from other disciplines. This assumption was debunked with the knowledge that nurses were always engaged in knowledge development, driven by their experiences in clinical practice. Because of these assumptions, most of the early writing about theory development was about outlining strategies that should be used, rather than strategies that have already been used in the discipline to develop theories. Theorists themselves did not uncover or adequately discuss ways by which they developed their theories, therefore the tendency was to describe processes that were based on theories developed in other disciplines, mainly the physical and social sciences. And an implicit assumption was made that there should be a single strategy for theory development, some claiming to begin the process from practice, and others believing it should be driven by research"--Provided by publisher.
650 0 $2 96060 $a Nursing $x Philosophy. $3 213275
650 1 2 $2 96060 $a Nursing Theory. $3 234075