Language:
English
繁體中文
KMU OLIS
Login
Back
Switch To:
Labeled
|
MARC Mode
|
ISBD
Impact of the Early Phase of the Cor...
~
University of Toronto (Canada).
Impact of the Early Phase of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic on the Quality of Cancer Care Delivered at a Comprehensive Cancer Centre /
Record Type:
Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:
Impact of the Early Phase of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic on the Quality of Cancer Care Delivered at a Comprehensive Cancer Centre // Melanie Lynn Powis.
Author:
Powis, Melanie Lynn,
Description:
1 electronic resource (270 pages)
Notes:
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-05, Section: B.
基督教聖經之智慧書導讀 :
Background: The impact of the COVID pandemic on the quality of cancer care delivered remains to be comprehensively evaluated. Objective: Evaluate the quality of cancer care delivered during the early phase of the pandemic at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre with a focus on gastrointestinal cancers. Design: Scoping literature review, cross-sectional survey and retrospective, comparative cohort study. Methods: A scoping review of COVID-related practice changes was undertaken. Patient perceptions of the quality of gastrointestinal cancer care they received during COVID were evaluated using an electronic survey (n=358). Clinical outcomes (all-cause mortality and disease progression) and quality measure performance for a cohort of newly diagnosed patients with colon, rectal or anal cancer during the early phase of the pandemic (02/20-12/20; n=294) were compared to those seen during the same period in the year prior (02/19-12/19; n=335). Results: Similar to the published literature, we found that during the early phase of the pandemic at PM there were fewer new consults, treatment interruptions were common, patient volumes were lower, a greater proportion of patients were diagnosed in the emergency department, fewer patients had surgery, and a greater proportion received short-course radiotherapy for rectal cancer. Most respondents, however, rated the overall quality of their cancer care as excellent or very good, and indicated that they were very likely to recommend PM to family or friends. COVID cohort performance was worse for quality measures related to receipt of appropriate oncology consultations for colon and anal cancer, and receipt of appropriate treatment for rectal and anal cancer, and more patients experienced a 30-day post-surgical readmission. The mean overall quality performance was lower in the COVID cohort than the comparator; however, only stage of disease was associated with score. No significant association between group and time to either all-cause mortality or disease progression was observed. Conclusion: While performance on some quality measures was impacted at the onset of the COVID pandemic, this has not translated into poor patient perceptions of their care, or poorer 2-year clinical outcomes. However, given the observed reduction in new patient consults, impacts of deferred cancer care on prognosis may be more distal.
Contained By:
Dissertations Abstracts International86-05B.
Subject:
Nursing. -
Online resource:
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30818462
ISBN:
9798342746625
Impact of the Early Phase of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic on the Quality of Cancer Care Delivered at a Comprehensive Cancer Centre /
Powis, Melanie Lynn,
Impact of the Early Phase of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic on the Quality of Cancer Care Delivered at a Comprehensive Cancer Centre /
Melanie Lynn Powis. - 1 electronic resource (270 pages)
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-05, Section: B.
Background: The impact of the COVID pandemic on the quality of cancer care delivered remains to be comprehensively evaluated. Objective: Evaluate the quality of cancer care delivered during the early phase of the pandemic at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre with a focus on gastrointestinal cancers. Design: Scoping literature review, cross-sectional survey and retrospective, comparative cohort study. Methods: A scoping review of COVID-related practice changes was undertaken. Patient perceptions of the quality of gastrointestinal cancer care they received during COVID were evaluated using an electronic survey (n=358). Clinical outcomes (all-cause mortality and disease progression) and quality measure performance for a cohort of newly diagnosed patients with colon, rectal or anal cancer during the early phase of the pandemic (02/20-12/20; n=294) were compared to those seen during the same period in the year prior (02/19-12/19; n=335). Results: Similar to the published literature, we found that during the early phase of the pandemic at PM there were fewer new consults, treatment interruptions were common, patient volumes were lower, a greater proportion of patients were diagnosed in the emergency department, fewer patients had surgery, and a greater proportion received short-course radiotherapy for rectal cancer. Most respondents, however, rated the overall quality of their cancer care as excellent or very good, and indicated that they were very likely to recommend PM to family or friends. COVID cohort performance was worse for quality measures related to receipt of appropriate oncology consultations for colon and anal cancer, and receipt of appropriate treatment for rectal and anal cancer, and more patients experienced a 30-day post-surgical readmission. The mean overall quality performance was lower in the COVID cohort than the comparator; however, only stage of disease was associated with score. No significant association between group and time to either all-cause mortality or disease progression was observed. Conclusion: While performance on some quality measures was impacted at the onset of the COVID pandemic, this has not translated into poor patient perceptions of their care, or poorer 2-year clinical outcomes. However, given the observed reduction in new patient consults, impacts of deferred cancer care on prognosis may be more distal.
English
ISBN: 9798342746625Subjects--Topical Terms:
186574
Nursing.
Subjects--Index Terms:
Cancer care
Impact of the Early Phase of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic on the Quality of Cancer Care Delivered at a Comprehensive Cancer Centre /
LDR
:04014nam a22004573i 4500
001
391395
005
20251124054750.5
006
m o d
007
cr|nu||||||||
008
251208s2024 miu||||||m |||||||eng d
020
$a
9798342746625
035
$a
(MiAaPQD)AAI30818462
035
$a
AAI30818462
040
$a
MiAaPQD
$b
eng
$c
MiAaPQD
$e
rda
100
1
$a
Powis, Melanie Lynn,
$e
author.
$3
523820
245
1 0
$a
Impact of the Early Phase of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic on the Quality of Cancer Care Delivered at a Comprehensive Cancer Centre /
$c
Melanie Lynn Powis.
264
1
$a
Ann Arbor :
$b
ProQuest Dissertations & Theses,
$c
2024
300
$a
1 electronic resource (270 pages)
336
$a
text
$b
txt
$2
rdacontent
337
$a
computer
$b
c
$2
rdamedia
338
$a
online resource
$b
cr
$2
rdacarrier
500
$a
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-05, Section: B.
500
$a
Advisors: Krzyzanowska, Monika K. Committee members: Singh, Simron; Sutradhar, Rinku; Alibhai, Shabbir M. H.
502
$b
Ph.D.
$c
University of Toronto (Canada)
$d
2024.
520
$a
Background: The impact of the COVID pandemic on the quality of cancer care delivered remains to be comprehensively evaluated. Objective: Evaluate the quality of cancer care delivered during the early phase of the pandemic at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre with a focus on gastrointestinal cancers. Design: Scoping literature review, cross-sectional survey and retrospective, comparative cohort study. Methods: A scoping review of COVID-related practice changes was undertaken. Patient perceptions of the quality of gastrointestinal cancer care they received during COVID were evaluated using an electronic survey (n=358). Clinical outcomes (all-cause mortality and disease progression) and quality measure performance for a cohort of newly diagnosed patients with colon, rectal or anal cancer during the early phase of the pandemic (02/20-12/20; n=294) were compared to those seen during the same period in the year prior (02/19-12/19; n=335). Results: Similar to the published literature, we found that during the early phase of the pandemic at PM there were fewer new consults, treatment interruptions were common, patient volumes were lower, a greater proportion of patients were diagnosed in the emergency department, fewer patients had surgery, and a greater proportion received short-course radiotherapy for rectal cancer. Most respondents, however, rated the overall quality of their cancer care as excellent or very good, and indicated that they were very likely to recommend PM to family or friends. COVID cohort performance was worse for quality measures related to receipt of appropriate oncology consultations for colon and anal cancer, and receipt of appropriate treatment for rectal and anal cancer, and more patients experienced a 30-day post-surgical readmission. The mean overall quality performance was lower in the COVID cohort than the comparator; however, only stage of disease was associated with score. No significant association between group and time to either all-cause mortality or disease progression was observed. Conclusion: While performance on some quality measures was impacted at the onset of the COVID pandemic, this has not translated into poor patient perceptions of their care, or poorer 2-year clinical outcomes. However, given the observed reduction in new patient consults, impacts of deferred cancer care on prognosis may be more distal.
546
$a
English
590
$a
School code: 0779
650
4
$2
96060
$a
Nursing.
$3
186574
650
4
$2
96060
$a
Medicine.
$3
219985
650
4
$2
96060
$a
Public health.
$3
206087
650
4
$2
96060
$a
Oncology.
$3
273823
653
$a
Cancer care
653
$a
COVID pandemic
653
$a
Patient centeredness
653
$a
Quality indicators
653
$a
Quality of care
690
$a
0992
690
$a
0564
690
$a
0569
690
$a
0769
690
$a
0573
710
2
$a
University of Toronto (Canada).
$b
Health Policy, Management and Evaluation.
$e
degree granting institution.
$3
523821
720
1
$a
Krzyzanowska, Monika K.
$e
degree supervisor.
773
0
$t
Dissertations Abstracts International
$g
86-05B.
790
$a
0779
791
$a
Ph.D.
792
$a
2024
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30818462
based on 0 review(s)
Multimedia
Reviews
Add a review
and share your thoughts with other readers
Export
pickup library
Processing
...
Change password
Login