高雄醫學大學圖書館 |

Dental Hygiene Educator's Awareness, Lived Experiences and Perceptions of Accreditor's Revised Standards on Coordination and Calibration: A Mixed Method Study /

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Dental Hygiene Educator's Awareness, Lived Experiences and Perceptions of Accreditor's Revised Standards on Coordination and Calibration: A Mixed Method Study // Ronda Jane Wood.
Author:	Wood, Ronda Jane,
Description:	1 electronic resource (218 pages)
Notes:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-09, Section: B.
基督教聖經之智慧書導讀 :	Since the 1970s, research has shown negative trends in teachers delivering inconsistent (uncoordinated) instructional guidance and inaccurate (uncalibrated) grading outcomes among medical and dental students, which were harmful teaching practices directly impeding student learning progressions. The problem addressed by this study was that many dental hygiene (DH) program leaders had reported challenges, unsustainability, and elusive positive outcomes while attempting to train faculty teams in coordination and calibration (C&C), a Commission on Dental Accreditation (CODA) standard to be met with documented compliance. The purpose of this sequential explanatory mixed-method study was to quantitatively measure a purposeful sample of CODA-accredited DH program leaders and faculty in the United States and Canada regarding their awareness levels of accreditor standards about C&C and to qualitatively understand their lived experiences of their C&C trainings. The theoretical frameworks used were Knowles' adult learning theory, Bloom's taxonomy, and Miller's prism of clinical competence. Four research questions guided a quantitative survey and a qualitative focus group for two data sets, with results subdivided by leader and faculty perceptions. Results showed that seasoned DH leaders held the most substantial CODA awareness levels, but awareness did not fully equate to understanding measured improvement evidence for quality assurance. New DH leaders, full-time faculty, and adjunct faculty desired more substantial awareness levels but encountered barriers. Common barriers included lack of time, scheduling conflicts, and lack of compensation uniquely perceived by each group. Clinical courses were identified as most vulnerable to uncalibrated exchanges. Most participants identified the lack of coordination and calibration as root causes of student complaints, unsustainable outcomes, and incohesive relationships. Fourteen recommendations for practice were presented. Future research is necessary on this topic.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International85-09B.
Subject:	Dentistry. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30991428
ISBN:	9798381953367

Dental Hygiene Educator's Awareness, Lived Experiences and Perceptions of Accreditor's Revised Standards on Coordination and Calibration: A Mixed Method Study /
Wood, Ronda Jane,

Dental Hygiene Educator's Awareness, Lived Experiences and Perceptions of Accreditor's Revised Standards on Coordination and Calibration: A Mixed Method Study /Ronda Jane Wood. - 1 electronic resource (218 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-09, Section: B.

Since the 1970s, research has shown negative trends in teachers delivering inconsistent (uncoordinated) instructional guidance and inaccurate (uncalibrated) grading outcomes among medical and dental students, which were harmful teaching practices directly impeding student learning progressions. The problem addressed by this study was that many dental hygiene (DH) program leaders had reported challenges, unsustainability, and elusive positive outcomes while attempting to train faculty teams in coordination and calibration (C&C), a Commission on Dental Accreditation (CODA) standard to be met with documented compliance. The purpose of this sequential explanatory mixed-method study was to quantitatively measure a purposeful sample of CODA-accredited DH program leaders and faculty in the United States and Canada regarding their awareness levels of accreditor standards about C&C and to qualitatively understand their lived experiences of their C&C trainings. The theoretical frameworks used were Knowles' adult learning theory, Bloom's taxonomy, and Miller's prism of clinical competence. Four research questions guided a quantitative survey and a qualitative focus group for two data sets, with results subdivided by leader and faculty perceptions. Results showed that seasoned DH leaders held the most substantial CODA awareness levels, but awareness did not fully equate to understanding measured improvement evidence for quality assurance. New DH leaders, full-time faculty, and adjunct faculty desired more substantial awareness levels but encountered barriers. Common barriers included lack of time, scheduling conflicts, and lack of compensation uniquely perceived by each group. Clinical courses were identified as most vulnerable to uncalibrated exchanges. Most participants identified the lack of coordination and calibration as root causes of student complaints, unsustainable outcomes, and incohesive relationships. Fourteen recommendations for practice were presented. Future research is necessary on this topic.

English

ISBN: 9798381953367Subjects--Topical Terms:

184886
Dentistry.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Faculty calibration

Dental Hygiene Educator's Awareness, Lived Experiences and Perceptions of Accreditor's Revised Standards on Coordination and Calibration: A Mixed Method Study /
LDR:03664nam a22004573i 4500 001 391404
005 20251124054752.5
006 m o d
007 cr|nu||||||||
008 251208s2024 miu||||||m |||||||eng d
020 $a 9798381953367
035 $a (MiAaPQD)AAI30991428
035 $a AAI30991428
040 $a MiAaPQD $b eng $c MiAaPQD $e rda
100 1 $a Wood, Ronda Jane, $e author. $3 523839
245 1 0 $a Dental Hygiene Educator's Awareness, Lived Experiences and Perceptions of Accreditor's Revised Standards on Coordination and Calibration: A Mixed Method Study / $c Ronda Jane Wood.
264 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2024
300 $a 1 electronic resource (218 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-09, Section: B.
500 $a Advisors: Cummins, Linda Committee members: Wratcher, Marcia; Lloyd, Carrie.
502 $b Ed.D. $c National University $d 2024.
520 $a Since the 1970s, research has shown negative trends in teachers delivering inconsistent (uncoordinated) instructional guidance and inaccurate (uncalibrated) grading outcomes among medical and dental students, which were harmful teaching practices directly impeding student learning progressions. The problem addressed by this study was that many dental hygiene (DH) program leaders had reported challenges, unsustainability, and elusive positive outcomes while attempting to train faculty teams in coordination and calibration (C&C), a Commission on Dental Accreditation (CODA) standard to be met with documented compliance. The purpose of this sequential explanatory mixed-method study was to quantitatively measure a purposeful sample of CODA-accredited DH program leaders and faculty in the United States and Canada regarding their awareness levels of accreditor standards about C&C and to qualitatively understand their lived experiences of their C&C trainings. The theoretical frameworks used were Knowles' adult learning theory, Bloom's taxonomy, and Miller's prism of clinical competence. Four research questions guided a quantitative survey and a qualitative focus group for two data sets, with results subdivided by leader and faculty perceptions. Results showed that seasoned DH leaders held the most substantial CODA awareness levels, but awareness did not fully equate to understanding measured improvement evidence for quality assurance. New DH leaders, full-time faculty, and adjunct faculty desired more substantial awareness levels but encountered barriers. Common barriers included lack of time, scheduling conflicts, and lack of compensation uniquely perceived by each group. Clinical courses were identified as most vulnerable to uncalibrated exchanges. Most participants identified the lack of coordination and calibration as root causes of student complaints, unsustainable outcomes, and incohesive relationships. Fourteen recommendations for practice were presented. Future research is necessary on this topic.
546 $a English
590 $a School code: 1625
650 4 $2 96060 $a Dentistry. $3 184886
650 4 $a Teacher education. $3 523842
650 4 $a Higher education administration. $3 523841
653 $a Faculty calibration
653 $a Instructional competency
653 $a Inter-rater reliability
653 $a Leadership in dental hygiene
653 $a Learning
653 $a Professional development
653 $a Development
690 $a 0446
690 $a 0530
690 $a 0567
710 2 $a National University. $b School of Education. $e degree granting institution. $3 523840
720 1 $a Cummins, Linda $e degree supervisor.
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 85-09B.
790 $a 1625
791 $a Ed.D.
792 $a 2024
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30991428