高雄醫學大學圖書館 |

Evaluation of Washington State Department of Health Prenatal Genetics Resources /

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Evaluation of Washington State Department of Health Prenatal Genetics Resources // Tyana D Trasvina.
作者:	Trasvina, Tyana D.,
面頁冊數:	1 electronic resource (91 pages)
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 86-01.
提要註:	Background: Prenatal care is one of the most utilized healthcare services in the United States (Osterman & Martin, 2018). Genetic screening and carrier screening are both an important aspect of prenatal care. A Prenatal Genetics Task Force, comprising experts from varied disciplines, was convened by the Washington State Department of Health (WA DOH) to address a recent Washington Administrative Code update (WAC Chapter 246.680), rapid uptake in prenatal screening tests, direct-to-consumer tests being marketed as gender reveal tests, and prenatal genetic tests happening in non-genetic clinical settings. This study aimed to evaluate two provider resources published by the task force on prenatal genetic screening and carrier screening and obtain feedback to determine if the resources met provider needs and increased provider confidence to order tests and interpret results for these topics.Methods: An online survey was created, and IRB approval was received. The survey was then uploaded to Survey Monkey and sent to providers via email by members of the Prenatal Genetics Task Force. The survey was open for three weeks. Qualitative responses were coded utilizing both deductive and inductive coding. Quantitative analysis included a Wilcoxon signed rank test, performed on questions pertaining to provider confidence in ordering and interpreting both carrier screening and prenatal genetic screening tests, before and after reviewing the Department of Health resources.Results: The survey gathered 37 responses. Three themes were unveiled through the coding process that easily summarize the results of this survey. For the carrier screening landing pages and fact sheets, the biggest feedback we received was the need for these resources to be translated into more languages, cost and insurance estimates to be added, and these resources were too much information for a busy provider to review when in a rush. For prenatal genetic screening, we found the most important feedback to be on cost/insurance estimates, more consideration around maternal age and what tests would be best to order for older women, and that these resources are expecting too much from providers. In our quantitative comparisons, we determined that there was a difference detected before and after reviewing the resources for ordering carrier screening tests and interpreting prenatal genetic screening results. Discussion: According to our Wilcoxon signed rank tests, there was a confidence increase in ordering carrier screening tests and interpreting prenatal genetic screening results, before and after exploring the Department of Health resources. There was no change in confidence between the carrier screening resources and the prenatal genetic screening resources, leading us to believe both resources are performing well. There are both strengths and limitations to this work.Conclusion: The survey results confirmed that the resources created are helpful, full of necessary and correct information, and can help increase confidence in non-genetic providers who order genetic testing for their prenatal and preconception patients.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International86-01.
標題:	Public health education. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31147475
ISBN:	9798383223437

Evaluation of Washington State Department of Health Prenatal Genetics Resources /
Trasvina, Tyana D.,

Evaluation of Washington State Department of Health Prenatal Genetics Resources /Tyana D Trasvina. - 1 electronic resource (91 pages)

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 86-01.

Background: Prenatal care is one of the most utilized healthcare services in the United States (Osterman & Martin, 2018). Genetic screening and carrier screening are both an important aspect of prenatal care. A Prenatal Genetics Task Force, comprising experts from varied disciplines, was convened by the Washington State Department of Health (WA DOH) to address a recent Washington Administrative Code update (WAC Chapter 246.680), rapid uptake in prenatal screening tests, direct-to-consumer tests being marketed as gender reveal tests, and prenatal genetic tests happening in non-genetic clinical settings. This study aimed to evaluate two provider resources published by the task force on prenatal genetic screening and carrier screening and obtain feedback to determine if the resources met provider needs and increased provider confidence to order tests and interpret results for these topics.Methods: An online survey was created, and IRB approval was received. The survey was then uploaded to Survey Monkey and sent to providers via email by members of the Prenatal Genetics Task Force. The survey was open for three weeks. Qualitative responses were coded utilizing both deductive and inductive coding. Quantitative analysis included a Wilcoxon signed rank test, performed on questions pertaining to provider confidence in ordering and interpreting both carrier screening and prenatal genetic screening tests, before and after reviewing the Department of Health resources.Results: The survey gathered 37 responses. Three themes were unveiled through the coding process that easily summarize the results of this survey. For the carrier screening landing pages and fact sheets, the biggest feedback we received was the need for these resources to be translated into more languages, cost and insurance estimates to be added, and these resources were too much information for a busy provider to review when in a rush. For prenatal genetic screening, we found the most important feedback to be on cost/insurance estimates, more consideration around maternal age and what tests would be best to order for older women, and that these resources are expecting too much from providers. In our quantitative comparisons, we determined that there was a difference detected before and after reviewing the resources for ordering carrier screening tests and interpreting prenatal genetic screening results. Discussion: According to our Wilcoxon signed rank tests, there was a confidence increase in ordering carrier screening tests and interpreting prenatal genetic screening results, before and after exploring the Department of Health resources. There was no change in confidence between the carrier screening resources and the prenatal genetic screening resources, leading us to believe both resources are performing well. There are both strengths and limitations to this work.Conclusion: The survey results confirmed that the resources created are helpful, full of necessary and correct information, and can help increase confidence in non-genetic providers who order genetic testing for their prenatal and preconception patients.

English

ISBN: 9798383223437Subjects--Topical Terms:

523819
Public health education.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Evaluation

Evaluation of Washington State Department of Health Prenatal Genetics Resources /
LDR:04576nam a22004333i 4500 001 391426
005 20251124054755.5
006 m o d
007 cr|nu||||||||
008 251208s2024 miu||||||m |||||||eng d
020 $a 9798383223437
035 $a (MiAaPQD)AAI31147475
035 $a AAI31147475
040 $a MiAaPQD $b eng $c MiAaPQD $e rda
100 1 $a Trasvina, Tyana D., $e author. $3 523891
245 1 0 $a Evaluation of Washington State Department of Health Prenatal Genetics Resources / $c Tyana D Trasvina.
264 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2024
300 $a 1 electronic resource (91 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 86-01.
500 $a Advisors: Turner, Anne M. Committee members: Enquobahrie, Daniel A.; Shridhar, Nirupama.
502 $b M.P.H. $c University of Washington $d 2024.
520 $a Background: Prenatal care is one of the most utilized healthcare services in the United States (Osterman & Martin, 2018). Genetic screening and carrier screening are both an important aspect of prenatal care. A Prenatal Genetics Task Force, comprising experts from varied disciplines, was convened by the Washington State Department of Health (WA DOH) to address a recent Washington Administrative Code update (WAC Chapter 246.680), rapid uptake in prenatal screening tests, direct-to-consumer tests being marketed as gender reveal tests, and prenatal genetic tests happening in non-genetic clinical settings. This study aimed to evaluate two provider resources published by the task force on prenatal genetic screening and carrier screening and obtain feedback to determine if the resources met provider needs and increased provider confidence to order tests and interpret results for these topics.Methods: An online survey was created, and IRB approval was received. The survey was then uploaded to Survey Monkey and sent to providers via email by members of the Prenatal Genetics Task Force. The survey was open for three weeks. Qualitative responses were coded utilizing both deductive and inductive coding. Quantitative analysis included a Wilcoxon signed rank test, performed on questions pertaining to provider confidence in ordering and interpreting both carrier screening and prenatal genetic screening tests, before and after reviewing the Department of Health resources.Results: The survey gathered 37 responses. Three themes were unveiled through the coding process that easily summarize the results of this survey. For the carrier screening landing pages and fact sheets, the biggest feedback we received was the need for these resources to be translated into more languages, cost and insurance estimates to be added, and these resources were too much information for a busy provider to review when in a rush. For prenatal genetic screening, we found the most important feedback to be on cost/insurance estimates, more consideration around maternal age and what tests would be best to order for older women, and that these resources are expecting too much from providers. In our quantitative comparisons, we determined that there was a difference detected before and after reviewing the resources for ordering carrier screening tests and interpreting prenatal genetic screening results. Discussion: According to our Wilcoxon signed rank tests, there was a confidence increase in ordering carrier screening tests and interpreting prenatal genetic screening results, before and after exploring the Department of Health resources. There was no change in confidence between the carrier screening resources and the prenatal genetic screening resources, leading us to believe both resources are performing well. There are both strengths and limitations to this work.Conclusion: The survey results confirmed that the resources created are helpful, full of necessary and correct information, and can help increase confidence in non-genetic providers who order genetic testing for their prenatal and preconception patients.
546 $a English
590 $a School code: 0250
650 4 $a Public health education. $3 523819
650 4 $2 96060 $a Public health. $3 206087
650 4 $2 96060 $a Genetics. $3 202246
653 $a Evaluation
653 $a Genetic testing
653 $a Prenatal care
653 $a Provider confidence
653 $a Online survey
690 $a 0369
690 $a 0573
690 $a 0500
710 2 $a University of Washington. $b Public Health Genetics. $e degree granting institution. $3 523892
720 1 $a Turner, Anne M. $e degree supervisor.
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 86-01.
790 $a 0250
791 $a M.P.H.
792 $a 2024
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31147475