高雄醫學大學圖書館 |

Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) Pain Drawing: Survey of Use, Barriers, and Potential Modifications /

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) Pain Drawing: Survey of Use, Barriers, and Potential Modifications // Jing Li.
Author:	Li, Jing,
Description:	1 electronic resource (62 pages)
Notes:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 86-01.
基督教聖經之智慧書導讀 :	Background: The Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) introduced the DC/TMD pain drawing to assess pain location and the presence of widespread pain, providing a valuable visual representation of a subjective experience. Using the DC/TMD pain drawing is recommended for routine use in dental practice, especially for individuals experiencing TMD or orofacial symptoms. As a useful component of the DC/TMD for over a decade, there hasn't been a specific study examining its utilization in both clinical and research domains. Key inquiries include identifying potential challenges or barriers associated with its application that may prevent healthcare providers from fully utilizing and benefiting from DC/TMD pain drawings in clinical and research settings.Aims: The primary aim of this study was to investigate the utilization of the DC/TMD pain drawing and identify associated barriers to its use. The secondary aim was to determine the necessity for and recommendations for modifying the current DC/TMD pain drawing. The last aim was to develop a new pain drawing with a visual representation of instructions based on findings from Aims 1 and 2 with the objective of enhancing pain location identification.Methods: This mixed-methods cross-sectional survey study was conducted using RED Cap© to address aims 1 and 2 completed in Spring 2024. The first survey was purposively distributed to an estimated 500 current members of the American Academy of Orofacial Pain and the IADR-INFORM DC/TMD translations group. The second survey was purposively distributed to 62 individuals who have published or worked on pain drawings within the last 10 years and the IADR-INFORM DC/TMD translations group. Surveys included single, multiple-choice, and open-ended questions to collect different perspectives on using and improving the DC/TMD pain drawing. Analyses included descriptive statistics, means, and standard deviations; the open-ended responses were summarized by the themes, and the frequency of unique individuals mentioning a theme was recorded. Results were compared between raters for agreement.Results: 49 participants completed Survey 1 and 21 completed Survey 2 (response rate=33.9%). Overall, Survey 1 had 45 participants (91.8%) familiar with the DC/TMD pain drawing. The top three ways mentioned of using the DC/TMD pain drawing are to visualize specific pain locations (n=32, 65.3%), as a screening tool for pain (n=27, 55.1%), and to visualize pain referrals (n=23, 46.9%). The top three concerns with using the DC/TMD pain drawing are no digital version (n=27, 55.1%), patients do not accurately draw their pain locations (n=22, 44.9%), and anatomical locations are not detailed enough to differentiate pain location (n=17, 34.7%). The survey 2 study indicates nearly 72.0% agreement that some modification could improve the DC/TMD pain drawing; for our improvement suggestions, 71.4% agreed on a visual representation of instructions (n=15), 66.6% agreed on adding a three-quarter view to replace the lateral views of the face (n=14), and 95.2% agreed to add a larger view of the back of the head (n=20). In addition, 52.4% agreed creating a new pain drawing should include pain characteristics (n=11), and only 23.8% (n=5) agreed with a color-coded system to represent pain quality. Based on the results of aim 1 and 2, our research team developed a new version of the pain drawing, which includes the additional enlarged front and back head view with the extension of neck region, bilateral ¾ face view, and the improved intraoral view by increasing the anatomical area, with a new page of visual instruction to help patients to draw all their pains on it.Conclusion: The DC/TMD pain drawing is being used by both clinicians and researchers despite barriers encountered, such as lack of digitalization/integration, concerns about accuracy, and desire for additional anatomical details. Using a priori team-developed suggestions and those from participants of this study, our research team has created and proposed a beta version of a derivative supplemental pain drawing with additional frontal, back of the head, three-quarter face, and extended neck views along with visual instructions to meet the needs of the stakeholders surveyed.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International86-01.
Subject:	Clinical psychology. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31297494
ISBN:	9798383221655

Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) Pain Drawing: Survey of Use, Barriers, and Potential Modifications /
Li, Jing,

Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) Pain Drawing: Survey of Use, Barriers, and Potential Modifications /Jing Li. - 1 electronic resource (62 pages)

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 86-01.

Background: The Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) introduced the DC/TMD pain drawing to assess pain location and the presence of widespread pain, providing a valuable visual representation of a subjective experience. Using the DC/TMD pain drawing is recommended for routine use in dental practice, especially for individuals experiencing TMD or orofacial symptoms. As a useful component of the DC/TMD for over a decade, there hasn't been a specific study examining its utilization in both clinical and research domains. Key inquiries include identifying potential challenges or barriers associated with its application that may prevent healthcare providers from fully utilizing and benefiting from DC/TMD pain drawings in clinical and research settings.Aims: The primary aim of this study was to investigate the utilization of the DC/TMD pain drawing and identify associated barriers to its use. The secondary aim was to determine the necessity for and recommendations for modifying the current DC/TMD pain drawing. The last aim was to develop a new pain drawing with a visual representation of instructions based on findings from Aims 1 and 2 with the objective of enhancing pain location identification.Methods: This mixed-methods cross-sectional survey study was conducted using RED Cap© to address aims 1 and 2 completed in Spring 2024. The first survey was purposively distributed to an estimated 500 current members of the American Academy of Orofacial Pain and the IADR-INFORM DC/TMD translations group. The second survey was purposively distributed to 62 individuals who have published or worked on pain drawings within the last 10 years and the IADR-INFORM DC/TMD translations group. Surveys included single, multiple-choice, and open-ended questions to collect different perspectives on using and improving the DC/TMD pain drawing. Analyses included descriptive statistics, means, and standard deviations; the open-ended responses were summarized by the themes, and the frequency of unique individuals mentioning a theme was recorded. Results were compared between raters for agreement.Results: 49 participants completed Survey 1 and 21 completed Survey 2 (response rate=33.9%). Overall, Survey 1 had 45 participants (91.8%) familiar with the DC/TMD pain drawing. The top three ways mentioned of using the DC/TMD pain drawing are to visualize specific pain locations (n=32, 65.3%), as a screening tool for pain (n=27, 55.1%), and to visualize pain referrals (n=23, 46.9%). The top three concerns with using the DC/TMD pain drawing are no digital version (n=27, 55.1%), patients do not accurately draw their pain locations (n=22, 44.9%), and anatomical locations are not detailed enough to differentiate pain location (n=17, 34.7%). The survey 2 study indicates nearly 72.0% agreement that some modification could improve the DC/TMD pain drawing; for our improvement suggestions, 71.4% agreed on a visual representation of instructions (n=15), 66.6% agreed on adding a three-quarter view to replace the lateral views of the face (n=14), and 95.2% agreed to add a larger view of the back of the head (n=20). In addition, 52.4% agreed creating a new pain drawing should include pain characteristics (n=11), and only 23.8% (n=5) agreed with a color-coded system to represent pain quality. Based on the results of aim 1 and 2, our research team developed a new version of the pain drawing, which includes the additional enlarged front and back head view with the extension of neck region, bilateral ¾ face view, and the improved intraoral view by increasing the anatomical area, with a new page of visual instruction to help patients to draw all their pains on it.Conclusion: The DC/TMD pain drawing is being used by both clinicians and researchers despite barriers encountered, such as lack of digitalization/integration, concerns about accuracy, and desire for additional anatomical details. Using a priori team-developed suggestions and those from participants of this study, our research team has created and proposed a beta version of a derivative supplemental pain drawing with additional frontal, back of the head, three-quarter face, and extended neck views along with visual instructions to meet the needs of the stakeholders surveyed.

English

ISBN: 9798383221655Subjects--Topical Terms:

261137
Clinical psychology.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Temporomandibular Disorders

Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) Pain Drawing: Survey of Use, Barriers, and Potential Modifications /
LDR:05813nam a22004333i 4500 001 391440
005 20251124054757.5
006 m o d
007 cr|nu||||||||
008 251208s2024 miu||||||m |||||||eng d
020 $a 9798383221655
035 $a (MiAaPQD)AAI31297494
035 $a AAI31297494
040 $a MiAaPQD $b eng $c MiAaPQD $e rda
100 1 $a Li, Jing, $e author. $3 523921
245 1 0 $a Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) Pain Drawing: Survey of Use, Barriers, and Potential Modifications / $c Jing Li.
264 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2024
300 $a 1 electronic resource (62 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 86-01.
500 $a Advisors: Chmieliauskaite, Milda Committee members: Drangsholt, Mark; Sotak, Nicholas; Randall, Cameron L.
502 $b M.Sc. $c University of Washington $d 2024.
520 $a Background: The Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) introduced the DC/TMD pain drawing to assess pain location and the presence of widespread pain, providing a valuable visual representation of a subjective experience. Using the DC/TMD pain drawing is recommended for routine use in dental practice, especially for individuals experiencing TMD or orofacial symptoms. As a useful component of the DC/TMD for over a decade, there hasn't been a specific study examining its utilization in both clinical and research domains. Key inquiries include identifying potential challenges or barriers associated with its application that may prevent healthcare providers from fully utilizing and benefiting from DC/TMD pain drawings in clinical and research settings.Aims: The primary aim of this study was to investigate the utilization of the DC/TMD pain drawing and identify associated barriers to its use. The secondary aim was to determine the necessity for and recommendations for modifying the current DC/TMD pain drawing. The last aim was to develop a new pain drawing with a visual representation of instructions based on findings from Aims 1 and 2 with the objective of enhancing pain location identification.Methods: This mixed-methods cross-sectional survey study was conducted using RED Cap© to address aims 1 and 2 completed in Spring 2024. The first survey was purposively distributed to an estimated 500 current members of the American Academy of Orofacial Pain and the IADR-INFORM DC/TMD translations group. The second survey was purposively distributed to 62 individuals who have published or worked on pain drawings within the last 10 years and the IADR-INFORM DC/TMD translations group. Surveys included single, multiple-choice, and open-ended questions to collect different perspectives on using and improving the DC/TMD pain drawing. Analyses included descriptive statistics, means, and standard deviations; the open-ended responses were summarized by the themes, and the frequency of unique individuals mentioning a theme was recorded. Results were compared between raters for agreement.Results: 49 participants completed Survey 1 and 21 completed Survey 2 (response rate=33.9%). Overall, Survey 1 had 45 participants (91.8%) familiar with the DC/TMD pain drawing. The top three ways mentioned of using the DC/TMD pain drawing are to visualize specific pain locations (n=32, 65.3%), as a screening tool for pain (n=27, 55.1%), and to visualize pain referrals (n=23, 46.9%). The top three concerns with using the DC/TMD pain drawing are no digital version (n=27, 55.1%), patients do not accurately draw their pain locations (n=22, 44.9%), and anatomical locations are not detailed enough to differentiate pain location (n=17, 34.7%). The survey 2 study indicates nearly 72.0% agreement that some modification could improve the DC/TMD pain drawing; for our improvement suggestions, 71.4% agreed on a visual representation of instructions (n=15), 66.6% agreed on adding a three-quarter view to replace the lateral views of the face (n=14), and 95.2% agreed to add a larger view of the back of the head (n=20). In addition, 52.4% agreed creating a new pain drawing should include pain characteristics (n=11), and only 23.8% (n=5) agreed with a color-coded system to represent pain quality. Based on the results of aim 1 and 2, our research team developed a new version of the pain drawing, which includes the additional enlarged front and back head view with the extension of neck region, bilateral ¾ face view, and the improved intraoral view by increasing the anatomical area, with a new page of visual instruction to help patients to draw all their pains on it.Conclusion: The DC/TMD pain drawing is being used by both clinicians and researchers despite barriers encountered, such as lack of digitalization/integration, concerns about accuracy, and desire for additional anatomical details. Using a priori team-developed suggestions and those from participants of this study, our research team has created and proposed a beta version of a derivative supplemental pain drawing with additional frontal, back of the head, three-quarter face, and extended neck views along with visual instructions to meet the needs of the stakeholders surveyed.
546 $a English
590 $a School code: 0250
650 4 $2 96060 $a Clinical psychology. $3 261137
650 4 $2 96060 $a Medicine. $3 219985
650 4 $2 96060 $a Dentistry. $3 184886
653 $a Temporomandibular Disorders
653 $a Orofacial pain
653 $a Pain drawings
653 $a Diagnostic Criteria
653 $a Healthcare providers
690 $a 0567
690 $a 0564
690 $a 0622
710 2 $a University of Washington. $b Oral Medicine. $e degree granting institution. $3 523922
720 1 $a Chmieliauskaite, Milda $e degree supervisor.
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 86-01.
790 $a 0250
791 $a M.Sc.
792 $a 2024
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31297494